I'm leaning slightly toward setStripRendantWhitespace() simply
because it is consistent with our naming convention and is clearer
up-front than "compressWhitespace".

Gili

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 11:44:05 -0800, Jonathan Locke wrote:

>
>i'll buy that.  but it's either setStripRedundantWhitespace or just 
>setCompressWhitespace as is (since it doesn't strip ALL whitespace, just 
>/redundant/ whitespace)
>
>Gili wrote:
>
>>      I still want the same functionality. I am simply saying that I
>>prefer using:
>>
>>setStripComments(boolean);
>>setStripWhitespace(boolean);
>>setStripWicketTags(boolean);
>>setStripWicketIDs(boolean);
>>setStripWicketIDPrefix(boolean);
>>
>>      instead of a single method that that a flag as an argument.
>>
>>Gili
>>
>>On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 20:24:16 +0100, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>>>Don't you want to enable/disable writing this specific tag? enable /
>>>disable = true / false = flag.
>>>
>>>Juergen
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 14:20:38 -0500, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>    
>>>
>>>>        I'm against the use of flags. You lose compile-time type safety
>>>>and this kind of code is hard to maintain over time (especially if you
>>>>wish to extend the class defining the flags). For an example of what I
>>>>mean, see DefaultButtonModel.java in Swing. Because they close to
>>>>implement the various states through flags, it is extremely
>>>>difficult/impossible to add support for a tri-state button.
>>>>
>>>>        I would much rather we separate the various states into
>>>>separate methods.
>>>>
>>>>Gili
>>>>
>>>>On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:45:29 -0800, Jonathan Locke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>>>maybe we should have a single setStrip(int flags) method and allow
>>>>>various things to be stripped via flags.
>>>>>
>>>>>STRIP_COMMENTS - removes html comments
>>>>>STRIP_REDUNDANT_WHITESPACE - compresses whitespace
>>>>>STRIP_WICKET_TAGS - removes <wicket:*> tags
>>>>>STRIP_WICKET_IDS - removes wicket ids entirely
>>>>>STRIP_WICKET_ID_PREFIXES - removes just the wicket id prefix
>>>>>
>>>>>make sense?
>>>>>
>>>>>Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>        
>>>>>
>>>>>>sounds much better. Does it make sense to have two separate flags to
>>>>>>enable/disable stripping. One for <wicket:....> and one for "empty"
>>>>>><span id="wicket-...">?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Juergen
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>>>>>>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>>>>>>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>Wicket-develop mailing list
>>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>          
>>>>>>
>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>>>>>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>>>>>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>Wicket-develop mailing list
>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>>>>
>>>>>        
>>>>>
>>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>>>>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>>>>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Wicket-develop mailing list
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>>>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>>>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Wicket-develop mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>>_______________________________________________
>>Wicket-develop mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>_______________________________________________
>Wicket-develop mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>




-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to