+1 wicket.markup.html.list.ListView
+1 wicket.markup.html.list.PageableListView

Juergen


On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 22:01:40 +0100, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i vote for
> 
> wicket.markup.html.list.ListView
> and
> wicket.markup.html.list.PageableListView
> 
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> 
> > Which is a good argument for not calling it a list, as (fat) changes
> > are you'll be using both in the same classes. This is not a problem
> > with packages however.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> > Jonathan Locke wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> yeah, but the component itself is called ListView not List for the
> >> reason that it conflicts with java.util.List
> >>
> >> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >>
> >>> But it is allready in the wicket.markup.html space, so it is obvious
> >>> that we're talking about components here. I don't like the 'view'
> >>> part here, as it seems a bit out of sync with the other package names.
> >>>
> >>> Eelco
> >>>
> >>> Jonathan Locke wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I'm +1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also, we should rename the package (list?) as well imo.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> yes, but its listview i think not list (which is a data structure
> >>>> rather than a component)
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'll be out for two days (be back tuesday evening)... could
> >>>>> someone please send an email to the user's list about any changes
> >>>>> to the table package. There's a few devs of Topicus currently
> >>>>> working on CVS-head that follow the user's list, but that do not
> >>>>> follow this list. Thanks in advance.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Eelco
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jonathan Locke wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> this package may have the features we want, but it's gotten
> >>>>>> sloppy.  i think we ought to refactor it so it becomes consistent
> >>>>>> in terms of naming.  also, there are some confusing API issues to
> >>>>>> resolve.  like what is the different between
> >>>>>> SortableTableHeaderGroup and SortableTableHeaders?  should both
> >>>>>> of these be public?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> we went and changed the naming for half this package, so why not
> >>>>>> finish the job?  i see no reason for the name Table to be used at
> >>>>>> all now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Table* -> PageableListView*
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> either that, or push all the Pageable functionality up into
> >>>>>> ListView so all ListViews are pageable.  that would reduce the
> >>>>>> surface area of the API at the expense of an int or two worth of
> >>>>>> data.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> btw, why not use viewSize instead of rowsPerPage?  that variable
> >>>>>> should be sufficient.
> >>>>>> let's see if we can't boil this all down some more.  it will be a
> >>>>>> very commonly used set of classes.  as it stands its a little too
> >>>>>> Baroque for my tastes.  ;-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-develop mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> >
> >
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-develop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to