+1 for a subclass of the exception with a clear error message.
-Igor
On 11/3/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hmmm
If we are going to support this then we are entering a slippery road.
Just being able to call a method with arguments (that i also have to parse to the right type)
So the question do we want to support this or not?
I now throw only a wicketruntimeexception but i can make a subclass and throw that one if that makes things more clear.
no problem.
johan
On 11/3/05, Juergen Donnerstag < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Johan,
the hangman example fails with
wicket.WicketRuntimeException: no get method defined for class: class
wicket.examples.hangman.Word _expression_: asString(true)
RFE: does it make sense to use something like WicketOgnlException
instead of WicketRuntimeException?
Juergen
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
