Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Most of the Wicket developers don't think Wicket is lacking on the Spring field /at all/. Wicket is not a managed framework, which means that in some cases you have more responsibilities yourself. Furthermore, there are several strategies that arise from these discussions. You can implement them all, now.
First, thanks for all the discussion. I suppose that all I'm reacting to is that my own code (Wicket + Spring for a bunch of DAOs) seems to be messier than I'd like. It may be that there's nothing that needs to be touched in Wicket. What I'd love is some more examples of "how to do it correctly" so I feel more confident that I'm not making a mess of my program.
[That said, on most fronts, the core developers are doing an amazing job of keeping Wicket clean, simple, and elegant. I'm impressed even if I don't yet deal with the internals enough to make any interest contributions. Thanks!]
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
