I can't do it with servlet filters. Because of our redirect_to_buffer.
Because the first time nothing is served except a redirect url
The second time only a byte[] is send to the output stream
We just have to have our own kind of filter.
johan
On 11/9/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could do this using servlet filters, right?
I think we start soon with formalizing the processing cycle,
url-handling and statemanagement and all hooks we provide for that.
Before we make spaghetti of Wicket.
Eelco
On 11/9/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What i want is put some performance statistics in the page. (how long it did
> take to render on the client and server side)
> This means just a few lines of _javascript_ one in the head and one at the
> end of the file.
>
> I don't want to specify this _javascript_ for all the html files (maybe i
> want to turn it off)
>
> The first thought it it is simple just override:
> WebApplication.WebResponse newWebResponse(final HttpServletResponse
> servletResponse)
> {
> return (getSettings().getBufferResponse()
> ? new BufferedWebResponse(servletResponse)
> : new WebResponse(servletResponse));
> }
>
> and return youre own version of the bufferedWebResponse that does some
> parsing when close is called on it.
>
> This would work only that inside wicket we have the special
> REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER and this makes
> it own BufferedResponse where everything is streamed to. And the buffered
> web response above is only used for the redirect url.
>
> Now i am thinking of change the 2 close() methods of the 2
> Buffered(Web)Response classes that they call a postProcessor with there
> buffer
> Like this:
>
> public final void close()
> {
> if (stringBuffer == null)
> {
> throw new WicketRuntimeException("The response has already been
> closed.");
> }
>
> super.close();
>
> stringBuffer =
> application.getPostProcessor ().process(stringBuffer); <<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> this.byteBuffer =
> convertToCharset(getCharacterEncoding());
> this.stringBuffer = null;
> }
>
>
>
> Or we could make a WebApplication.newBufferedREsponse()
> (like newWebResponse())
>
> Currently it is just a bit strange that you can overwrite youre own
> WebResponse but for the most part of wicket
> that one won't be used for anything except sending a client side redirect.
>
> anybody a better idea?
>
> johan
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
