Of course, but that would be the same in your case, wouldn't it?
On 11/16/05, Janne Hietamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > You could acchieve the same by using LoadableDetachableModel or - what
> > I usually do - just override Model:
> >
> > final User user ...
> > Label l = new Label(id, new Model() { getObject(Component c) { return
> > user.getxx; } });
> >
> > Eelco
>
> Not the same, since Model would also need the setObject() (if the
> property is writable). And it would double the code.
>
> --
> Janne Hietamäki
> Cemron Ltd
> http://www.cemron.com/
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
> Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam
> for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv28&alloc_id845&opclick
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-develop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv28&alloc_id845&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
