i havent had the time to create a test suite for the repeater package yet so please play around with it. any feedback is always welcome.
-Igor
On 11/29/05,
Laurent PETIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
On 11/30/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the thinking behind RepeatingView and OrderedRepeatingView was that they
> hold static rows that are not refreshed between requests. you simply add
> your items to the views at construction time. so why have a strategy if your
> rows are not dynamic?
Ok, yesterday I missed the point that, indeed, RepeatingView &
OrderedRepeatingView are intended to work with direct additions, not a
model providing the data, so my suggestion was non-sense.
> perhaps we can introduce something between the pageable view and the
> repeating view. factor out the repopulation into that and only introduce
> paging in the pageable view. i will need to evaluate that idea when i have a
> bit more time.
That is indeed what I should have suggested.
Because I can see times (as for the use of Forms) where the "Pageable"
aspect is not needed. Not that it gets in the way of the developers,
though. But it is not satisfying to have extra methods & extra notion
in mind if it is of no use for the current use case.
Thanks for your answer,
--
Laurent
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&opclick
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
