Bugs item #1383714, was opened at 2005-12-17 18:28
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684975&aid=1383714&group_id=119783

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: 1.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ralf Ebert (dreivier)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Enabled properties for Component/AttributeModifier not versi

Initial Comment:
When trying to build some tests, I saw that
- a components enabled property is currently not versioned (which can be 
important I think) - there is a comment about this and that it's because of 
the Links auto enabling, but is there no way to build this without 
disabling versioning of this property?
- the attributemodifier has a enabled property with getter and setter 
which is not versioned as well which can cause strange behaviour if this is 
enabled/disabled across different versions of a page
-> I think this should be a isVisible() method only (which could even go to 
IBehaviour and get handled by the component so the behaviour has not to 
care about this) or it should be versioned (which probably would make 
sense with IBehaviour/AbstractBehaviour as well)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684975&aid=1383714&group_id=119783


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to