we already do this.

webapplication provides a session factory via inner class that creates WebSession objects by default.

-Igor



On 1/9/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While writing a chapter for Wicket in action, I noticed that each
application /has/ to specify a session factory implementation, and
their own session class.

Is that really necessary? Or could Wicket provide a default implementation?

That would make it very easy to create simple apps of the level 'hello
world' etc.

Martijn


--
Living a wicket life...

Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst

Wicket 1.1 is out: http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&opclick
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to