Though it must not contain any Wickte component tag like <tag id="wicket-.."> or <wicket:....>. Reason: if not disabled, wicket will complain about missing markup or missing components.
Juergen On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:46:08 +0100, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep, that's it. > > Gili wrote: > > > I assume this means this part of the HTML is purely for > >previewability purposes and during runtime it gets completely stripped > >out, including its body/children-tags, right? > > > >Gili > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > >Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > >It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > >_______________________________________________ > >Wicket-user mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
