OK, i will try 1_0_0 branch.

/Frank B.

On Thursday 14 July 2005 20:59, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> HEAD is 1.1b1 (not yet, but will be this weekend). 1.0.x is in the 1_0_0
> branch.
>
> Eelco
>
> frank bengtsson wrote:
> >Hi there,
> >
> >I just builded HEAD and it say's: wicket-1.0.0-rc3.jar
> >
> >is that 1.1b1 or is it 1.0.1 ?
> >
> >
> >/Frank B.
> >
> >On Thursday 14 July 2005 17:43, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >>FYI,
> >>
> >>We plan on releasing maintenance release 1.0.1, AND 1.1 beta 1 (or some
> >>simular name) this weekend.
> >>
> >>We changed our mind about 1.1 a bit, and now want to make shorter
> >>release cycles so everyone can start working with some of the new
> >>features of 1.1:
> >>
> >>* Native javascript/ css support (finally you can use DatePicker, and
> >>create your own beautified components);
> >>* Markup inheritance (Phil wrote about that two days ago:
> >>http://jroller.com/page/pKulak/20050712)
> >>
> >>These are the most important new features, which we think are important
> >>enough to put in a release now.
> >>
> >>Furthermore there have been two refactorings which unfortunately may
> >>break some of your code:
> >>
> >>* Form. The form handling is better seperated now, giving you better
> >>extension options. Also, Button now has a 'direct' property which lets
> >>you by-pass validation and updating of its nested components (you can do
> >>that manually now though). IFormValidationStrategy is now history.
> >>* The choice components. Customizing how choices are rendered is now
> >>greatly simplified. We got too many questions on its uses from the list;
> >>a clear indicator it was too complex to use. IChoice and some
> >>corresponding methods are gone now, and IChoiceRenderer is the current
> >>interface now.
> >>
> >>We plan on (further) working on AJAX integration and Portal integration
> >>next, which will probably be version 1.2, and have do decide yet what
> >>more features we'll put in that release. Be warned, AJAX and Portal (JSR
> >>168) integration /will/ effect our API and is likely to cause breaks
> >>(though a lot should actually be internal, but changes could be
> >>drastic). That's another reason for putting out 1.1 now; there's not
> >>much damage done still ;)
> >>
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>
> >>Eelco
> >>
> >>
> >>-------------------------------------------------------
> >>SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> >>from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> >>informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> >>speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Wicket-user mailing list
> >>[email protected]
> >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-- 
Frank Kastell Bengtsson
Kastell


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to