+1
Hi Eelco,
Sorry I did not respond before on the list topic. I know too little about
Wicket, and you were just faster.
Thanks for proposing it,
Christian
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:48:51 +0200, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we should remove these methods. They are quite easy to implement
yourself, and they limit the ways we can change ListView's internals.
I can see they are 'handy', but I feel they also mess up the idea that a
low level component should be one thing at a time.
Some other users seem to feel the same about it, which is why I start
this vote.
Eelco
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September
19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing &
QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Christian Essl
___________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
