Re: [Wicket-user] Replace 'wicket:id' with 'id'

[Martijn Dashorst]

You don't have to do anything with the html id if you wish. You are completely free to do anything you want with it: forget it (best option), or assign a value (should be unique across the whole document in order to validate against HTML 4 and or xhtml). Wicket doesn't require it.

Martijn

On 10/11/05, Eduardo Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I was wondering if I didn't need to repeat the same name in wicket:id and id.

2005/10/11, Martijn Dashorst < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >:

Why would you want to do this?

The nature of the wicket:id xml tag is such that it is not a great candidate for a HTML id. A html id is very handy for selecting in CSS, and you don't want version numbering in there.

Martijn

On 10/11/05, Eduardo Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

Is there an easy way of replacing 'wicket:id' with 'id' instead of strip all the 'wicket:id'?