Again I thank you all developers of the framework and people who are kind and genouris to share their information & experience here.
On 10/13/05, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
As a general note: wicket is a community effort. The core developers need to split their time between building the best framwork possible, solving bugs, writing documentation, giving support on the mailinglists, discussing future designs. And *ALL* this in their free time.
It would help a lot when anyone who thinks documentation is lacking, that they provide articles on the wiki, or patches to the javadoc. Especially when their question is answered.
Martijn
On 10/13/05, Ali Zaid <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:A good framework would provide good documentation too :), still I love wicket!!!--On 10/12/05, Timo Stamm <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Ali Zaid wrote:
> Scott Man, Thanks allot, I will try it today, I wonder why a great framework
> like wicket don't have a simple thing like FileDownloadLink() or other
> simple solution.
A good framework doesn't provide you with implementations for all
possible use cases. It should rather make it trivial to implement to
implement all possible use cases.
Timo
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Regards, Ali
--
Regards, Ali
