Yep, totally. Anyting you like. If a component should /not/ be attached to a certain tag, it should tell you so by throwing an exception. Some of the formcomponents do this.
Eelco On 10/17/05, Jason Essington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had some markup that looked something like: > > <table> > <tr> > <td><span wicket:id="myPanel">[myPanel]</span></td> > <td><span wicket:id="myOtherPanel">[myOtherPanel]</span></td> > </tr> > </table> > > I want to make some of the columns visible or not at runtime, so > rather than adding another wicket:id to the td tag, and adding my > panel to a WebMarkupContainer, I did something like: > > <table> > <tr> > <td wicket:id="myPanel">[myPanel]</td> > <td wicket:id="myOtherPanel">[myOtherPanel]</td> > </tr> > </table> > > and can just set my panel as visible or not. > > So my question is, Is it reasonable to use a tag such as the <td> tag > in place of the <span> tag that would ordinarily hold my panels? > > -jason > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, > and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
