1.1
 
-Igor
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Berman
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 8:59 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Standalong Radio component ?

What release will these new components be a part of?

--Andrew

On 10/19/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Working on the checkbox components now. I am wandering what you guys think would be a good name.
The radio components are named RadioGroup and Radio, so I was thinking CheckBoxGroup and CheckBox but we already have a CheckBox component.
 
Any suggestions?
 
-Igor
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Igor Vaynberg
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 10:15 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Wicket-user] Standalong Radio component ?

yes, the checkbox version has already been requested.
I will try to crack it out tonight or the next day.
 
-Igor
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johan Compagner
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:08 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Standalong Radio component ?

i like this new component. very nice
But shouldn't we also not have the same thing for checkboxes?
(and get a replacement for CheckBoxMultipleChoice like we did now with RadioChoice)

On 10/18/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
I agree, for what it's worth.

On 10/17/05, Eelco Hillenius < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like a good one for core.
>
> Eelco


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Reply via email to