(it works for the examples project just fine to have multiply Applications in one WebApplication)
On 11/13/05, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#: Martijn Dashorst changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 8/17/2005 9:41 PM :#
> Huy Do wrote:
>
>> Perfect sense. Thanks Igor and Gili for your help.
>>
>> It was just a bit confusing looking at all the examples (cdapp etc)
>> and seeing the way things are structured.
>>
> Yeah, I can see that it is confusing. The examples are in fact different
> applications put into one war. Normally you'd only have one Application
> object for your WAR.
>
> Martijn
>
Sorry for reviving this quite old thread, but it was the only reference I could find on Wicket
application concept and still I cannot find a good explanation for this :-S.
It looks to me that the decission upon how you organize the web application from the pov of
WebApplications must take into account:
i/ the ApplicationSettings you are using (and probably the most important is the rendering strategy)
ii/ defining some kind of namespaces (f.e. <context>/users for user management, <context>/roles for
roles management, etc.).
Does this make sense or it is mandatory/required/recommended to always use a single WebApplication
for the whole web application?
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
