No specific reason. Please open an RFE. Thanks Juergen
On 11/15/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using Wicket 1.1, and am trying Markup Inheritance for the first > time. I'm confused as to why <wicket:child> must be empty. > > This: > > <wicket:child/> > > works fine, but this: > > <wicket:child> > <div id="main"><p>Main content here</p></div> > </wicket:child> > > fails with > > wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Expected to find <wicket:child/> in > base markup > > Is there a good reason for this? I know that I can simply do > > <wicket:remove> > <div id="main"><p>Main content here</p></div> > </wicket:remove> > <wicket:child/> > > but that doesn't really smell right. Is there some good reason that > wicket:child can't have a disposable body in the markup to enhance > previewability? > > -- Scott > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today > Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam > for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv28&alloc_id845&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
