Whatever. I must be starting to suffer from that famous open source
fatigue; I'm getting tired of that integration stuff. I'd hope there
would be more emphasis on core issues.

Anyway, if there's a bunch of people that agree on method x, and at
least one core developer regards that as a 'best practice', I'm fine
with deleting the rest for clarity. And once we have that, let's
finally put out an 'official release' and promote it as such.

Eelco



On 11/20/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as far as i can see 90% of wicket.contrib.data.model in wicket-contrib-data
> is about creating a database-backed list for the listview. same can be
> solved much more elegantly with the dataview.
>
> What does wicket-contrib-hibernate get me besides a shiny object model that
> stores more in the session then some small pojos? The biggest flop, though,
> is that i still have to provide all the plumbing myself - if anything, a
> hibernate framework should solve that.
>
> Maybe calling it obsolete was a bit too harsh, i apologize if i hurt
> anyone's feelings. But can we point to it and say that this is our official
> way to do RAD integration with hibernate? i honestly hope no one would. That
> is why in my previous email i asked for a concrete list of
> features/requirements so that we can put something together that will please
> most people, call it official, and put this issue to rest once and for all.
>
>
> -Igor
>
>
>
>
> On 11/20/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I don't agree with wicket-contrib-data being obsolete. What happened
> > is that I created some basic Hibernate support classes last year, and
> > that other people commented that they didn't like them so much, and
> > wanted to add alternatives. From there it grew into the bunch a quasi
> > related classes it is now. I still think classes like
> > HibernateObjectModel are pretty useable. You may argue about how
> > elegant the choices as hibernate session delegate etc are, and you may
> > even argue that it is not best practice to bind to Hibernate in your
> > view layer. But not every project has to display the perfect
> > seperation of (service) layers and these classes gives users the
> > opportunity to go for a more RAD approach. Depending on how much Phil
> > (and did other people work on that project?) wants to keep, we could
> > do a clean-up and keep only the classes we still think are usuable.
> >
> > We don't have to promote the project as best practices, but saying
> > it's obsolete goes a bit too far.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > On 11/20/05, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > wicket-contrib-data and wicket-contrib-data-hibernate do not provide any
> > > form of transaction management. furthermore, they are obsolete due to
> > > repeater package (what used to be wicket-contrib-dataview) in
> > > wicket-extensions.
> > >
> > > also, this discussion did not have much to do with spring itself, but
> with
> > > the fact that it isnt the greatest idea to tightly couple your
> persistence
> > > layer with your ui layer, because that forces your business logic to
> live
> > > inside the ui.
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
> > Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
> > for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv28&alloc_id845&opclick
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv28&alloc_id845&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to