Pepone, did you check out URL mounting in 1.2? Those nice urls come much handier than in 1.1 now. There is a usuage example: niceurl in project wicket-examples.
Eelco On 1/30/06, pepone pepone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nobody see this as a problem?? > > On 1/24/06, pepone pepone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all > > > > I using wicket and think that there is samething wrong in this > > framework when you have 10 diferents classes in > > wicket.markup.html.link and there isńt way to create a bookmarkable > > link to a resource that need params using any of them. > > > > and with my knowledge of wicket there isn't a simple way of do it. > > > > Other thing that i cosider is wrong in this framework is the way in > > you handle "nice url" because mount a Page can break it, if the page > > use params because params aren't in request->getParam() > > > > The user must changue the way in they retrive pageParams. this is not > > clean in WebFramework that try to simplificate the developers work. > > and it must be complety transparent for end users > > > > > > I view same inecesary complexity in this details. Or the way in you > > implement AbstractRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy and hard code the > > charcter "/" four times in the same file and you must implement other > > class only for changue this seperator is excesive work for and end > > user point of view. > > > > I write this lines as a constructive critique of what i see wrong in > > wicket i don't try to disturb you. And in general Wicket is a good > > work and i experct it'll be better in a near future > > > > -- > > play tetris http://pepone.on-rez.com/tetris > > > > > -- > play tetris http://pepone.on-rez.com/tetris >
