Vote for 2. On 2/17/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a non-binding (the developers ultimately decide) call votes > concerning whether we should fold the upcomming constructor changes > with our move to Java 5 or not. See for a discussion of those changes > other threads, please use this thread for voting only. > > 1. Give me the constructor change and the Java 5 functionality in one > pass (Wicket 2.0) > 2. Do the constructor change in a seperate release (Wicket 1.3) and > put Java 5 in the next (Wicket 2.0) > 3. I don't want either one and I want to stay on Wicket 1.2. > > This last option has no real effect except that you explicitly say > that you prefer a long lasting support on 1.2 over new features. > > Also, take into consideration that the less versions we have to > maintain seperately, the quicker we probably can implement them. > > Your votes please? > > Btw, it is still our plan to be up-to-date with Wicket In Action. > > Eelco > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user >
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user