I may be offering an opinion on something already decided, but it seems
to me that if we change the constructors in an earlier release, and then
go to Java 1.5 on a subsequent release, if that makes maintenance of two
versions easier (post-1.5 and pre-1.5) easier.  Advantages:

(1) Less future work for the developers means faster improvement to
Wicket in the long run.

(2) The applications produced by users who cannot upgrade to 1.5 yet
will be easier to upgrade when they finally can do so -- the obsolete
user code they're accumulating won't be quite so obsolete.

(3) The inconvenience of upgrading user code in two phases (for those
who have no impediments to using Java 1.5 now) is a transitory problem.

Of course, one could make this argument about any code-breaking change
to the API, delaying the upgrade to Java 1.5 indefinitely.  But I'm
assuming that the constructor changes are an unusually severe break in
the API.

/Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco
Hillenius
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:15 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Results so far (was Re: [Wicket-user] VOTE)

I agree with Johan here. I want to start discussing it on the admin
list shortly. But it looks like there are enough for 2 - not the
majority, but enough - to make seperate releases. We should decide on
whether 1.2. (we might call that version differently actually, but
that's another question) or 1.3. is going to be our long running
supported version. I think the latter, and 1.2. based on requests, but
we have yet to discuss that. Btw Jonathan's vote was #2 - he sent me
that offline.

We'll give you an update later this week or this weekend. Thanks for
voting all!

Eelco


On 2/22/06, karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and yeah more expected to come in :)
>
> On 2/22/06, karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok for the benefit of others, the summary of vote that actually
matters - .
> >
> > Igor - 1
> > Johan - 2
> > Eelco - 1
> >
> > So ,
> >
> > 2 votes for both at once (constructor and JDK5)
> > 1 vote for split releases
> >
>
>
> --
>  -- karthik --
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD
SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to