Is there anything interesting in the new servlet specs besides the garbage they added to make JSP and JSF work better? I vaguely remember something about servlet context. But at this time, I don't feel like we are missing much?
Eelco On 2/23/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Depending on the outcome of our internal discussion, for future versions of > Wicket java 5 may be required, and perhaps we'll up the servlet api > dependency as well. > > Martijn > > > > On 2/23/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > java 1.4 > > any servlet container from 2.3 and up > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > On 2/23/06, Nino Wael < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I' ve tried to look on the wicket home page to see what the minimum > requirements are for wicket, but haven't been able to find any clear > message. > > > > > > Any one who know what they are? Im thinking of Java version and such, > does it run with Tomcat 4.1.18 ? > > > > > > > > > Regards Nino > > > > > > > > -- > > Living a wicket life... > > > > Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst > > > > Wicket 1.1.1 is out: > http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1 > > > > -- > Living a wicket life... > > Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst > > Wicket 1.1.1 is out: > http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
