On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 09:47:02 +0530, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI, Matt Raible asked me to give my opinion about Wicket and some of
it's competitors. He presenting it tonight at the server side
symposium, and you can find his presentation here:
http://www.virtuas.com/articles/webframework-sweetspots.html
Eelco
Tapestry
4. What is the future of your web framework? What?s coming that?ll make it
easier for users to develop with? Do you support Ajax natively? If not,
are you planning on adding support?
Tapestry 4.0 has very good Ajax support via the Tacos library. Tapestry
4.1 will make a number of internal API changes to make that support even
better.
Tapestry 5 will be significantly advanced over Tapestry 4 or anything
else; planned features
are
? No more abstract classes.
? No inheritance imposition.
? Annotations directly on fields rather than on (abstract) methods.
? No XML, just templates and annotations.
? Smart class loader; pick up changes to classes automatically and
efficiently.
? Minimal APIs, beyond annotations.
? Aspect-oriented construction of components, using mix-ins.<<<<<<<
i see post <a
href=http://jroller.com/page/JonathanLocke?entry=mixed_types_and_wicket>Mixed
Types and Wicket</a> of JonathanLocke , now see Howard Lewis Ship also
speak about same topic. it's seem topic is important
can every one speak about this in wicket ?
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
