-Igor
On 4/1/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yeah i am also completely lost at the moment
Can somebody start from the beginning again?
johan
:)On 3/31/06, Martijn Dashorst < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:And now my HEAD hurts, or was it head HURTS? :-)
MartijnOn 3/31/06, Gwyn Evans < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Yes, that's what I was meaning by the last bit of my previous email -
it just comes down to different shorthand for the main CVS development
branch.
My issue was that saying you checked into "head" is reasonably
unambiguious whereas if I said to /get/ something from head, the
question is did I mean HEAD, as then I could legitimately be talking
about either SVN or CVS and in both cases should really specify
whether on the head/trunk or a branch.
So yes, "head" is for cvs, trunk is for svn, but "HEAD" is for both.
/Gwyn
On 31/03/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> svn dir called trunk is usually where the main branch is. cvs had no dir
> like this because tags/branches were treated differently. in svn tags and
> branches are treated like folders just like the main branch dir.
>
> so if you say i checked something into head in cvs, svn analogous would be i
> checked it into trunk.
>
>
> -Igor
>
>
>
> On 3/31/06, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> Surely SVN's HEAD is exactly the same as CVS's HEAD, in that they both
> refer to the latest revision in the particular branch that you're
> working?
>
> In both cases you need to specify the branch, which might be "trunk"
> (svn) or "the main trunk" (cvs)...
>
> Or are you just using "head" to refer to for what I've called "the
> main trunk", rather than the "HEAD" in "cvs update -r HEAD"?
>
> /Gwyn
>
>
> On 31/03/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > what do you mean?
> >
> > we have wicket top level: /svnroot/wicket
> >
> > then under wicket we have
> >
> > wicket/branches
> > wicket/labels
> > wicket/trunk
> >
> > so trunk is analogous to cvs head
> >
> > -Igor
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/29/06, Gwyn Evans < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > Except it's more complex than that, in that svn still has HEAD for the
> > revisions, with trunk just being the conceptual root from which
> > branches split.
> >
> > /Gwyn
> >
> > On 29/03/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > head is for cvs, trunk is for svn :)
> > >
> > > -Igor
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user--
Wicket 1.2 is coming! Write Ajax applications without touching _javascript_!
-- http://wicketframework.org
