MI is probably better suited for L&F (and feedback we get indicates that it is easier to use), but there are still plenty good use cases for Border. MI for example can not be used inside a Panel or Border "bordering" a specifc html tag/region (compared to the whole Page or Panel as MI does).
Juergen On 4/12/06, Gregg Bolinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I first started looking at Wicket it was all about Borders for page > templating and consistency. Recently, evaluating Wicket again, I see Markup > Inheritance is boasted quite a bit, including the article on JavaLobby. > > My question is, is MI now the preferred way to layout multiple pages keeping > the same L&F or is there still need for Borders? Personally, I like MI > quite a bit better. It's more OO to me and simpler. But I don't want to be > missing out on something just because MI is easier. > > Thanks for any information. > > Gregg bolinger > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user