MI is probably better suited for L&F (and feedback we get indicates
that it is easier to use), but there are still plenty good use cases
for Border. MI for example can not be used inside a Panel or Border
"bordering" a specifc html tag/region (compared to the whole Page or
Panel as MI does).

Juergen

On 4/12/06, Gregg Bolinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I first started looking at Wicket it was all about Borders for page
> templating and consistency.  Recently, evaluating Wicket again, I see Markup
> Inheritance is boasted quite a bit, including the article on JavaLobby.
>
> My question is, is MI now the preferred way to layout multiple pages keeping
> the same L&F or is there still need for Borders?  Personally, I like MI
> quite a bit better.  It's more OO to me and simpler.  But I don't want to be
> missing out on something just because MI is easier.
>
> Thanks for any information.
>
> Gregg bolinger
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to