so take datepicker, datepicker.html has a <wicket:head> section. what we need to do is to somehow get that portion as a charsequence so that the ajax request target can dump it as part of component's markup. we also need to capture the head output from behaviors. i dont know how feasible it all is.
this might solve _javascript_, but what about <link tags for css? are those legal outside the head? and will browsers pick them up if we write them out via outerhtml?
-Igor
On 5/4/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not sure I understand what needs to be done. I guess I'll wait until
tomorrow until the "that is how the output must look like" question is
solved.
Juergen
On 5/4/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i guess in this case we need to capture the head output of the component
> during ajax render and dump it into the markup before the component.
>
> Juergen are you reading with us? do you think this is feasible?
>
> -Igor
>
>
>
> On 5/4/06, Rüdiger Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > right, and that is the main problem to solve. is a <script tag
> > > legal in the middle of html? because maybe we can capture the head
> > > output and just insert it into html
> >
> > <script> Tags in the middle of HTML are working in all browsers I ever
> > had to use this. I'm not 100% sure if it's legal, but I think the main
> > reason for putting _javascript_ in the head is, that it is definitly
> > loaded before any markup is using it.
> >
> >
> > > -Igor
> >
> >
> > > On 5/4/06, Bruno Borges < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Igor, I'm not sure if browsers support the "update head" thing
> > > (probably not), but one "first step" solution is to notify the
> > > component that it is been added through Ajax, so the component must
> > > generate a "load" function and return that function name to the Ajax
> > > call, so the Ajax JS can call that function "postprocessing".
> >
> > > Of course, the main problem still continues: how to add the .js
> > > file of DatePicker/anything else, to the html page dynamically.
> >
> >
> > > On 5/4/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > yes, there is a problem indeed with components that need head
> > > contribution and are added via ajax. the problem is that when the
> > > component is added via ajax its header contribution is ingored
> > > because the head section is not updated. so in case of the
> > > datepicker the js it needs is never added to the page.
> >
> > > im not really sure what the good solution for this is. maybe we
> > > can update the head, but do browsers take that into account? will a
> > > <script tag added to head via outerhtml replacement be processed by
> > > the browser? can you even use outer/innerHtml on elements in the
> > > head region of the page?
> >
> > > any thoughts/ideas are welcome.
> >
> >
> > > -igor
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 5/3/06, Bruno Borges < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Oh, one mistake in the code I sent.
> >
> > > - The id for newUserLink I'm using is "newUser";
> >
> > > Everything works: AjaxLink replacing the div, the panel, submit,
> > > etc. Only the datePicker JS isn't working!
> >
> > > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 5/4/06, Bruno Borges < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm trying to load a Form Panel's child, and this panel is been loaded
> through an AjaxLink.
> >
> > > The DatePicker icon doesn't work. The calendar doesn't shows up.
> > > Is there any incompatibility between loading panels with Ajax and
> > > DatePicker within?
> >
> > > My code looks like this:
> >
> > > class Index extends WebPage {
> > > <constructor> {
> > > final Label welcome = new Label("bodyPanel", "Welcome");
> > > add(welcome);
> >
> > > AjaxLink goHome = new AjaxLink("home") {
> > > ... {
> > > getPage().replace(welcome);
> >
> > > target.addComponent(welcome);
> >
> > > }
> >
> > > };
> >
> > > AjaxLink newUserLink = AjaxLink("home") {
> > > ... {
> > > UserFormPanel panel = new UserFormPanel("bodyPanel");
> >
> > > getPage().replace(panel);
> >
> > > target.addComponent(panel);
> >
> > > }
> >
> > > };
> >
> > > add(newUserLink);
> > > add(goHome);
> >
> > > }
> >
> >
> > > }
> >
> > > class UserFormPanel extends Panel {
> > > <constructor> {
> > > add(new UserForm("userForm"));
> >
> > > }
> >
> > > }
> >
> > > class UserForm extends Form {
> > > <constructor> {
> > > ... // other basic fields like 'username', 'email', 'password'
> >
> >
> > > // Date field "fieldBirthday"
> > > RequiredTextField fieldBirthday = new
> > > RequiredTextField("birthday", Date.class);
> > > fieldBirthday
> > > .add(DateValidator.maximum(Calendar.getInstance ().getTime()));
> > > add(fieldBirthday);
> >
> > > // DatePicker for "fieldBirthday"
> > > DatePickerSettings settings = new DatePickerSettings();
> > > settings.setIfFormat("%d/%m/%Y");
> > > settings.setWeekNumbers(false);
> > > DatePicker datePicker = new DatePicker("datePicker", fieldBirthday ,
> settings);
> > > add(datePicker);
> >
> > > }
> >
> > > }
> >
> >
> > > I can say for sure: the datepicker component was working
> > > perfectly before opening the panel through AjaxLink (actually,
> > > UserFormPanel was UserFormPage before this).
> > > Am I missing something here?
> >
> > > Regards,
> >
> > > --
> > > Bruno Borges
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sun Certified Java Programmer for 1.4
> > > Sun Certified Web Component Developer for 1.4
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > --
> > > Bruno Borges
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sun Certified Java Programmer for 1.4
> > > Sun Certified Web Component Developer for 1.4
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> >
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
