Yes...and I'm repeating myself here Igor....but that'll be fantastic.
On 5/5/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but its still confusing as hell to have a constructor like DropDownChoice(String, IModel, IModel) it just plain sucks generics will make it much better DropDownChoice<T>(String, IModel<T>, IModel<List<T>>) then at a glance you know where things go. and yes IModel is a tricky beast, mainly because it is so flexible. though, i think once you get used to it you can wield its power quiet effortlessly. -Igor On 5/5/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > One thing I found particularly awkward was how models work in some of > > the form widgets, i.e. DropDownChoice, ListMultipleChoice, etc. This > > is where I found the Wicket learning curve was greater because it > > wasn't nearly as intuitive as I had expected. > > > > Strange thing is they work exactly like Swing Comboboxes and Lists.. > The selected objects are just the objects that are in the total list. > > And you have a Renderer that displays the objects.. (to display a text in a label that is the "toString" of the object) > > The only difference is is that in wicket you also need to generate a String id because we need that to send to the browser. > > johan > >
------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
