On 5/20/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we did communicate this... See Martijns mails and my replies on it over branching..
Ok, my email was explicitly about it though, AND additionally to wicket-user. Doesn't matter, it is communicated now for sure :)
And if develop now something to get it into production in a few months you should stick to 1.2 But if it does take longer you could use trunk. It is now a fast moving target. But many of those changes are java 5 related and that is no behaviour change.. So that shouldn't affect at all. as far as i can see now there is only one big code change: Converters that would affect the compile of code.
Well, even the Java 5 stuff breaks code, and as we're also just half way implementing that, I suspect there will be a lot of bugs in it currently. And wicket-extensions and wicket-examples don't even compile currently. But that's hopefully fixed in a couple of days?
For the rest only the default change of another kind of pagemap/session store is what needs to be tested but there are people that already tested that when it was in a branch (the clientsidestate branch)
Also, I'd like to get rid of the pre-registration of package resources. And maybe backport that if that is done. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
