see wicket:message. It exists a tag like <wicket:message ..> and as attribute wicket:message. It is a first draft, not added by default (I think), not needs some improvements to accomondate packaged refs etc. as well. That is easily doable.
Juergen On 8/3/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Igor Vaynberg: > > > well..this is what it would be...checking every attribute of > > every tag. this will be done only once when the markup is loaded > > into the cache so there wont be a performance hit. > > Attribute values are arbitrary strings. I wouldn't parse that. > What if I put wicket:something on purpose? I don't expect a weird > exception to be throwed. > > Attribute names on the contrary are normalized and you can safely > add new constructs, as allowed by XML namespaces. > -- > Jean-Baptiste Quenot > aka John Banana Qwerty > http://caraldi.com/jbq/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
