Sure, if it has to be just like Wicket to compete; you win. ;-) /Anders
Eelco Hillenius wrote: > I looked into some demos briefly yesterday, but it looks to me that > it's quite different from Wicket. It looks nice when it comes to tool > integration etc, but I immediately missed the 'just Java programming'/ > OO part of Wicket. > > Eelco > > > On 8/29/06, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Korbinian Bachl wrote: >>> Hi Anders, >>> >>> i heard much about WebObjects, and have a qustion: is it true, that you need >>> apple (OS) in order to run it ? - where here with Windows/ Linux >>> environments.... >> Not at all. I use version 5.2.4. It has official support for development >> tools on Mac and Windows and deployment on Mac, Windows and Solaris. You >> can run it on any j2se (1.4) platform. Many use Linux. >> >> About a year ago Apple released 5.3: >> 1) Development environment mas made part of Apple's Xcode, and >> distributed for free. >> 2) Deployment license is bundled with Mac OS X Server. >> 3) Officially Apple only supports their own hardware and OS. There are >> very good open source tools (better than Apple's) that support >> development on any platform, and you can deploy on any platform, but you >> have to buy Mac OS X Server to get a deployment license. >> >> >> Recently at WWDC Apple made some new announcement. I don't know exactly >> what it was. All I know is this: >> >> http://lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-dev/2006/Aug/msg01144.html >> >> >> /Anders >> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Korbinian >>> >>> PS: can you point out what in your opinion is superior to Wicket from >>> WebObjects ? e.g. a small comparision? >>> >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag >>>> von Anders Peterson >>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. August 2006 10:41 >>>> An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] WebObjects open source? >>>> >>>> I know WebObjects much better than I know Wicket... >>>> >>>> The only reason I looked at Wicket is because Apple made some >>>> very strange decisions regarding licensing and support for >>>> other platforms about a year ago. Should the open source >>>> rumors be true (I'm not sure they are) I'll most likely go >>>> back to (stay with) WebObjects. >>>> >>>> This is a good place to start: >>>> >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebObjects >>>> >>>> >>>> WebObjects has a very good on-line community, and there is a >>>> collection of open source frameworks and development tools >>>> that support/extend it. >>>> One you should definitely know about is WOLips: >>>> >>>> http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/Home >>>> >>>> >>>> /Anders >>>> >>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote: >>>>> Apple will make (most of) WebObjects open source with the >>>> new release >>>>> (http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0608webobjects.html). >>>>> >>>>> Has anyone worked with WebObjects and wishes to comment on >>>> it compared >>>>> to Wicket? >>>>> >>>>> Martijn ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
