> because he wants to link to a page, the obvious component is PageLink and it > takes a Page instance in its contructor - so its the most obvious way to > link to a page for a noob.
Erm. Maybe. I didn't get that from his email. > you guys keep outvoting me on removing that > constructor, but its just causing problems :) The whole class is not even > necessary. You have Link and BookmarkableLink, implementing the auto-enable > is as simple as overriding isenabled(). Huh? Who is 'you guys'? I don't remember a formal vote, and if there would have been any the last year I would have voted +1 for removal - certainly after we had setResponsePage. So start a vote then. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
