i don't like this to much.
if you don't want detaching then use another model.. (and not a DetachableXXXXModel that doesn't detach)

johan


On 11/2/06, Geoff hendrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we can all make strong cases for situations in which detaching the ID makes sense, and depending on the needs of the app, also situations where just serializing the POJO makes sense. Shades will work with either case.

What I would like, is the freedom to offer the deployer of the Phonebook, the opportunity to choose the strategy. Could we have some sort of configuration parameter that controlled the detachment strategy of DetachableContactModel?

Some property like

serializeOnDetach=false

This would give the deployer the freedom to make the "space vs. time" decision.

-geoff




____________________________________________________________________________________
Low, Low, Low Rates! Check out Yahoo! Messenger's cheap PC-to-Phone call rates
(http://voice.yahoo.com)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to