On 22/11/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/22/06, James McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This does bringing up what the default permission scheme should be. For now > > we are allowing anyone who is logged in to read/write (No more anonymous). > > Once we have the maintainers sorted out, would it be better to give write > > permission to only maintainers, admins, wicket devs? > > Sounds good, or make it a captcha aware signup page. Or make the > registration moderated, using the sourceforge id of the registrant. > > Martijn
Yes, it'll almost certainly need something more than just signup, as we had that with the old wiki, but we still got spammed quite regularly before I added some additional checks. (Specifically, http://www.homelandstupidity.us/software/bad-behavior/, but that was PHP, whereas maybe a captcha will be easier to add to this wiki.) /Gwyn -- Download Wicket 1.2.3 now! - http://wicketframework.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
