Okay. Thanks.
Erik van Oosten wrote: > > Looking in the code of AjaxLink I see no special code for > enabled/disabled state. > > If it fits what you need, you could try AjaxFallBackLink. > Otherwise try to extend AjaxLink and override the method > renderComponentTag in which you remove the onclick attribute from the > tag. (Don't forget to call super.renderComponentTag.) > > Regards, > Erik. > > De Soca schreef: >> Hello, >> >> just wondering if this a bug or a feature. >> >> Using one of the AjaxLink samples included in the Wicket examples, it >> seems >> that the setEnabled flag is ignored for AjaxLinks. >> >> i.e ajaxLink.setEnabled(false); >> >> Seems to have no effect. >> >> Is this a feature or defect etc? >> >> Thanks. >> > > -- > Erik van Oosten > http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cannot-disable-AjaxLink-tf2722626.html#a7598967 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
