Considering that Wicket's documentation is ok (actually quite good compared to many other products), I would like to interpreted it as good news :)
Francis Amanfo schreef: > And do we interpret this as good news or bad news. To play the devils > advocate here, this might also be interpreted as a framework with bad > documentation and hard to use. So people often have o consult the > mailing list to pose questions. What do you think? > > > On 11/30/06, *Erik van Oosten* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Congratulations, this mailing list is the most active java web > framework > forum on Nabble! > > http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2006/11/wicket-most-active-java-web-framework.html > > <http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2006/11/wicket-most-active-java-web-framework.html> > > -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
