My question is, nevertheless, would it be a significant implementation change to swap calls order from to current to iterator(...) first and size() later? then adding support for both cases in a SortableDataProvider (Case 1: Big databases - 2 Calls, Case 2: Small databases - 1 Call)...
>From my point of view, if supporting both cases, just by swapping those method calls (if so easy is it...), then it would be great, no worries to look for another impl... all-in-one... Just wondering... ;) Thank you for all your answers... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
