> > On 12/22/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > Are we going to add this to core or as a wicket-stuff project? > > > > On 12/22/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But who is going to maintain it then? Adding stuff to our core is good > and all, but it needs to be maintained. > > Personally I think the best lifecycle is to become a Wicket stuff > project, make sure it grows community support and then vote it into > core. Or find one (better: 2) core committer sponsor willing to > support it.
Hi, obviously I'd like it to be included in the core project ;-) , but it makes sense to me also to start including in wicket-stuff (I have committer access to wicket-stuff). Also, remember that it is a wicket 2 module, so hopefully there will be plenty of time to test it. And obviously the "sponsors" committer can count on me for support (it's a simple project anyway) -- filippo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
