Yeah, I think there's a lot that can be done with ejb3/jpa, and I know that people are more comfortable with standards approved by Sun than they are with the Hibernate name. (There are some useful HibAnno relationships that didn't make it into the spec, tho.)
Seems to me like validation and possibly bean editing using jpa annotations would be a great Wicket sub-project (or projects). But actually loading and persisting the data is a separate concern, right? Nathan Martijn Dashorst wrote: > Oh well, > > I find it very good to stirr up such a discussion. > > In fact I think that the ejb package could be just what the doctor > ordered for this in particular. javax.persistence while not the > end-all-be-all of ORM, does have annotations for all conceivable > relationships. This would make such scaffolding pretty standard and > possibly easy (easier?) to achieve. > > The biggest hurdle then becomes validation and tweaking of the > beanedit panel (which fields do you show and which not, providing > labels for the fields). > > Martijn > > > On 1/9/07, Nathan Hamblen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Please ignore my spirited reply to that old message below. Somehow Gmane >> (or Thunderbird?) has marked a bunch of old listserv messages as new, >> and it is causing me to live in the past. >> >> Nathan Hamblen wrote: >>> Experience with creating a "databinding" API... hmmm... >>> [blah blah BLAH] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
