no - i dont think so. your aproach would be enough, as the spaces seem to be
too big overhead.  

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag 
> von Filippo Diotalevi
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 22:59
> An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: 
> Jarforwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
> 
> On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm with Filippo.
> > +1 for one wiki, one web site. Let's keep it real simple 
> off the bat 
> > +and not
> > create any administrative headaches. Most projects have only one 
> > maintainer, and there are no separate mailing lists. We 
> should be able 
> > to evolve into spaces later, if necessary.
> >
> 
> Yes. Let me just add that every subprojects will have *at 
> most* 4-5 pages of documentation. Do we really want to create 
> a whole workspace, user and the like just for 4-5 pages?
> 
> --
>   filippo
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join 
> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to 
> share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief 
> surveys - and earn cash 
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge
&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to