Yeah, but when you have big chunk and everything, you don't necessary want
this to be in the Java world. At least, that what I think since I want all
my "decoration" in html and all my logic in java...
On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/24/07, Marc-Andre Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the wiki, there is a gotcha that look like this :
> Adding wicket:head to a Page
>
> <wicket:head> is intended for panels and borders only. Do not add this
to a
> page.
>
> The problem is : it is exactly what I wanted to do. I got a child class
> that need to add some css/javascript to the header of the page. Is it
> because our design is too pour or just that this is not true anymore or
what
> else? I wanted to have a little more detailed about that.
> Thanks
The WIKI entry was wrong or at least outdated. I changed it. Note that
can can use add(HeaderContributor.forJavaScript(..)) etc for the same
thing.
Eelco
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
