On 1/31/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > no, client side state is not something we support, and probably will not in > the foreseeable future. there are a lot of downsides to doing so that are > outlined in numerous threads on this list.
We've played around with the idea of letting components doing their own URL contribution. However, we currently feel that even though it might be nice to have that (that's at least what I think), it would also put users in the wrong way and Wicket would probably be used as a kind of framework it was not designed for. Also, at this stage we think it is premature optimization. See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-197 Of course, as always, patches or proof of concepts would be very welcome :) Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
