We don't recommend putting the Wicket servlet at /*, you can find it
all over the mailinglist and on the WIKI. This is because the servlet
then has to serve *ALL* things in the application context, provided
you don't tweak the web.xml to do otherwise.

Apparently they serve a lot of static things from the root context.

Martijn

On 2/13/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Martijn Dashorst:
>
> > Use the wicket filter instead.
>
> Can you please tell why it makes such a big performance difference
> between the servlet and the filter?  I never noticed that.
> --
>      Jean-Baptiste Quenot
> aka  John Banana   Qwerty
> http://caraldi.com/jbq/
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to