feel free to go ahead and do that. looking forward to your analysis.

-igor


On 3/8/07, aozster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


--> before voting we should compare them by given usecases and construct
it
with 1.x and 2.x constructors.
I prefer
1 rich internet application
2 highly personalized user interfaces for portal
3 CMS
to be our usecases.


Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> We've gathered a lot of opinions by now (more are still welcome
> though!) and I think we should let this sink in for a bit.
>
> There are a couple of projects being built on 2.0 (see the replies in
> this thread, but also
> http://www.mail-archive.com/general@lists.ops4j.org/msg00240.html),
> but so far, people who reacted seem to be understanding and flexible
> to go with us if we would decide to revert the constructor change.
>
> It looks like quite a few people, more than I expected in fact,
> weren't that crazy about the constructor refactor in the first place,
> though some people like it better in general (me being one of them
> though I see disadvantages as well, but also
> http://www.mail-archive.com/general@lists.ops4j.org/msg00402.html).
> Based on the replies in this thread, it seems that people find add
> more intuitive and like the flexibility that gives you over the
> tighter model of 2.0
>
> I propose to start a real vote on what to do with the constructor
> change somewhere next week. Until then, please feel free to keep
> venting your opinions on this thread.
>
> Regards,
>
> Eelco
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IMPORTANT%3A-your-opinion-on-the-constructor-change-in-2.0-tf3358738.html#a9388671
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to