no there is a discussion about that.

1.3 feature set would be a merge between 2.0 and 1.3 when we drop 2.0

And no releasing it quickly will not mean that we will release a java5
version quickly
because that will mean we will again have multiply branches to support.

johan


On 3/14/07, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Is the feature set for 1.3 set? I vote to remove everything that may
delay the release of that version.

With alternative C; when would you estimate 1.4 (Java5) could be released?

/Anders

Johan Compagner wrote:
> 1.4 will be java5 (when C is done first)
> That we can do pretty quickly.
> (not direclty releasing it but usable for people who want 1.3 + java5)
>
> johan
>
>
> On 3/14/07, * Anders Peterson* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Can anyone vote?
>
>     I vote for alternative D.
>
>     You asked about reverting the constructor change or not. My
>     interpretation of the answers you got is: Yes, fine, what ever, but
give
>     us generics (for models at least).
>
>     Alternative D is: Revert to working on 1 branch (doesn't matter if
it's
>     called 1.3 or 2.0) and make moving to Java5 (adding Generics) top
>     priority.
>
>     /Anders
>
>     Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>      > Hi,
>      >
>      > It looks like the discussion around reverting the constructor
change
>      > that we did for 2.0 has cooled down. This email is not a vote
>     yet, but
>      > a summary of opinions so far[1]. Those of you Wicket committers
who
>      > didn't have your say yet (Juergen, Frank, Gwyn, Janne, Jan, Ate),
I
>      > consider that an OK for reverting. If not, please reply to the
>     thread.
>      > Juergen, you have been working on 2.0 quite a bit. Can you please
>      > state your opinion, and can you tell us whether there are more
>      > functional differences between 1.3 and 2.0 other than the
constructor
>      > change, Java 5 features, the attach/ detach change and improved
>     models
>      > and validators?[2]
>      >
>      > I think so far we can safely say reverting is supported broadly.
At
>      > least, of the people who reacted, most stated they actually
preferred
>      > add over the new constructor, and those who were either neutral
>     or had
>      > a slight preference for the new constructor would still support
>      > reverting as that would keep the momentum for the project going.
>      >
>      > So, it looks like this may happen. But we'll vote about that in a
>     few
>      > days. Before we do that, we have to reach consensus on the
package
>      > we'll vote on. We have some different - and strong - opinions[3]
>     so we
>      > need to find a way to bridge that. Here are what I think the
>     different
>      > opinions:
>      >
>      > a) focus on stabilizing 1.3 first, meanwhile keep supporting 2.0
>      > (though only for bugfixes). 1.4 will be the release with
backports of
>      > the currently missing 2.0 features, and 1.5 will be 1.4 + the
Java 5
>      > features (including generics).
>      >
>      > b) as a) but rather than developing 1.3 up to a final release,
freeze
>      > asap (only fix bugs) and start on 1.4
>      >
>      > c) put all backports except for the Java 5 features in 1.3 after
the
>      > beta1 release (which we agreed upon doing this weekend). 1.4 will
be
>      > for the Java 5 features, and the branch should be started as soon
as
>      > 1.3 is feature complete.
>      >
>      > Maybe the most constructive way to gather opinions here is to
first
>      > let people plainly state what they prefer before we enter
discussion
>      > mode. So, please state what package you think is the best idea
(or
>      > introduce d if you want), and why.
>      >
>      > Cheers,
>      >
>      > Eelco
>      >
>      > [1]
>
http://www.nabble.com/IMPORTANT%3A-your-opinion-on-the-constructor-change-in-2.0-tf3358738.html#a9350505
>     <
http://www.nabble.com/IMPORTANT%3A-your-opinion-on-the-constructor-change-in-2.0-tf3358738.html#a9350505
>
>      >
>
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-IMPORTANT%3A-your-opinion-on-the-constructor-tf3359229.html#a9344068
>      > [2] http://www.nabble.com/State-1.3--features-tf3376983.html
>      > [3]
>
http://www.nabble.com/VOTE%3A-backporting-wicket-2.0-model-change-to-1.3-tf3364601.html
>      > http://www.nabble.com/roadmap-tf3366743.html
>      >
>      >
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>      > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>      > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
>     share your
>      > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn
cash
>      >
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>     <
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>     Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
>     share your
>     opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>     <
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Wicket-user mailing list
>     Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to