> 1.2.6 > > we no longer need bodycontainer in 1.3 because we have a much more elegant > system for handling such things
Are you saying that overriding getVariation on a page will work properly in 1.3 already? > > -igor Separate threat but kind of related: >> Apparently the usecase is pretty rare (only discovered after 2 years >> of production use) >Well, you can't really know as you don't know how many people ever bumped >across this and decided to implement a workaround without mentioning it to >us. >... >Eelco I think Eelco is right. It may be inaccurate to make assumptions about how rare a use case might be based on what feedback you get on the mailing list. Some people may find work arounds for a framework problem/issue or they might just give up trying to do something that is causes problems - possibly because they believe that they are doing something wrong or are missing some essential points about how to use the framework. This is exactly what I did at first with page.getVariation() - I ended up overriding getVariation in the panels instead of the pages as this seemed to work without getting errors. This got me by for a while. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
