hi,
i think it should work  since I had patched it as the same way  in yesterday. i 
also mentioned it in another email.

ps, I checked the Page object , and find the  NPE bug  about version manager is 
still there.

 
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:09:08 -0700
> From: "Eelco Hillenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] crtypted url cannot work for current 2.0
> snap shot
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Sorry about Tooy Li, I agree you did give us quite a few hints.
> 
> We're just very busy, and it's hard to find time to get all the things
> done we need.
> 
> Anyway, I applied a slightly modified version of the patch you
> proposed. Can you check it out please and acknowledge it works? It
> really helps to get concrete fix suggestions, preferably patches. :)
> 
> Eelco
> 
> 
> On 4/13/07, tooy li(Gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> hi,
>> I think i have paste the enough message! actually, i pasted the message 
>> again and again.
>>
>> 1. version --> current snap shot for 2.0
>> 2. exception  please check [http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL 
>> PROTECTED]/msg25968.html]
>> 180953 [btpool0-4] ERROR wicket.RequestCycle - [Ljava.lang.String;
>> java.lang.ClassCastException: [Ljava.lang.String;
>>
>> 3. sence: open a ajax modal . use a customed error page.
>>
>> I also know it's VOLUNTEER WITH $0 project, but i have to take some pressure 
>> from the end client.
>> since most of people in this planet use struts or ww, you have to do better 
>> to erase these noise to testify your
>> choise is right.
>> recently, i have to an some question such  as, why we havn't 2.0 release 
>> version  now ? why the crypted url cannot work for a month time ?....
>> if i don't  resovle these problem asap, they will doubt the wicket framework 
>> can work well again.
>> I have make a lot's of question in these mail list , most of them can get 
>> usefull reply, so , i 'm very very appreciate it.
>> sorry, I don't want to make any annoy, but i expected the bug fix too long.
>>
>> and thx for your work.
>>
>>
>>
>> > Message: 4
>> > Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:01:38 +0200
>> > From: "Martijn Dashorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] crtypted url cannot work for current 2.0
>> > snap shot.
>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Message-ID:
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>> >
>> > If you don't provide a better message, then how can we solve your problem?
>> >
>> > What is the exception? Do you use head of trunk, or some other
>> > version? If you want us to help you, help us do that by providing the
>> > correct information.
>> >
>> > We have stated that we would fix bugs in 2.0, for as long we don't
>> > have backported all features. But only on a case by case basis, and
>> > this is not an offer without a time limit: you are expected to migrate
>> > to our new, constructor change-less version.
>> >
>> > Remember: this is a volunteer effort, and we work our collective asses
>> > of to make Wicket the best framework $0 can buy. But we can only do
>> > what time permits us to do. Any time devoted to trunk makes 1.3
>> > delayed.
>> >
>> > Martijn
>> >
>> > On 4/13/07, tooy li(Gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> and the customed error page also cannot work well. when i open a modal 
>> >> window by ajax link, it will generate some error. I has complained it for 
>> >> a long time, but nobody care it. :( . 2.0 is really dead now.
>> >>
>> >> at 
>> >> wicket.protocol.http.request.CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy$DecodedUrlRequest.getParameter(CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy.java:458)
>> >>  at 
>> >> wicket.protocol.http.request.AbstractWebRequestCodingStrategy.decode(AbstractWebRequestCodingStrategy.java:102)
>> >>  at 
>> >> wicket.protocol.http.request.CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy.decode(CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy.java:107)
>> >>
>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
>> >> your
>> >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>> >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Wicket-user mailing list
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
>> > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
>> > Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
>> > http://wicketframework.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> > Message: 5
>> > Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:14:13 -0700
>> > From: "Alexei Sokolov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] ajax / javascript widgets in wicket
>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Message-ID:
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> >
>> > That solution will replace <ul> element and all of its children, which is
>> > not what I want.
>> >
>> > I need something like one-time-use javascript behavior, which can be
>> > attached to a component and then discarded after first rendering.
>> >
>> > Alex
>> >
>> > On 4/13/07, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>  We had this question 2 days ago, solution is in wiki:
>> >>
>> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-repaint-a-listview-via-ajax.html
>> >>
>> >> the List actions itself like add and delete are part of List and you just
>> >> would have to ListView.setList(yourListInHere) prior to repainting the
>> >> markupcontainer with ajax.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  ------------------------------
>> >> *Von:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Im Auftrag von *Alexei Sokolov
>> >> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 13. April 2007 00:41
>> >> *An:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> *Betreff:* [Wicket-user] ajax / javascript widgets in wicket
>> >>
>> >> Hello guys,
>> >>
>> >> I have a question about designing ajax/javascript widgets using wicket.
>> >> Here is my problem:
>> >>
>> >> I have a form, which I submit using ajax submit button and I have a list
>> >> view like this:
>> >>
>> >> <ul>
>> >>   <li wicket:id="item">blah</li>
>> >> </ul>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> What I want to do is:
>> >> - add a new <li> element to the list (but don't change other DOM nodes in
>> >> the document)
>> >> - call a javascript function to apply some visual effects to the item
>> >>
>> >> I want a similar method for removing items from the list, updating items,
>> >> etc.
>> >>
>> >> How do I design such widget?
>> >>
>> >> Thank you,
>> >> Alex
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
>> >> your
>> >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>> >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Wicket-user mailing list
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>> >>
>> >>
>> > -------------- next part --------------
>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> > Message: 6
>> > Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:21:41 -0700
>> > From: "Igor Vaynberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Multi page inheritance
>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Message-ID:
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> >
>> > thomas,
>> > i just dont have the time to look into this further. my hunch is that it
>> > should work. there is nothing wrong with taking a componenttag and 
>> > upgrading
>> > it to a wickettag at any point in the chain. so do give it a try and see if
>> > you really do hit a wall instead of playing the "what if" game.
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> >
>> > On 4/13/07, Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Isn't <span wicket:id="fkjksdfjs"> a ComponentTag and <wicket:extend> a
>> >> WicketTag? Some WicketTags seem already to be processed in this chain, so
>> >> creating them later out of ComponentTags would not be a good solution.
>> >>
>> >> Tom
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:48:54 +0200, Igor Vaynberg
>> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > it will not be wrapped into wickettag, only wicket namespaced tags are.
>> >> > it
>> >> > will be wrapped into componenttag, but it is a chain, you can then wrap
>> >> > the
>> >> > componenttag into a wicket tag :)
>> >> >
>> >> > -igor
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 4/12/07, Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > does it need to be before?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Well, it should before XmlTags will be wrapped in
>> >> >> ComponentTags/WicketTags, isn't it?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Tom
>> >>
>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
>> >> your
>> >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>> >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Wicket-user mailing list
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>> >>
>> > -------------- next part --------------
>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
>> > your
>> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wicket-user mailing list
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>> >
>> >
>> > End of Wicket-user Digest, Vol 11, Issue 87
>> > *******************************************
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wicket-user mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 
> 
> End of Wicket-user Digest, Vol 11, Issue 93
> *******************************************
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to