On 5/10/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eelco Hillenius a écrit :
> The only thing that mildly bothers me is that the 'Push' sounds like
> on-way-traffic to me. Can we come up with additional ideas? Something
> with Channel in it maybe? Or am I the only one feeling uneasy with the
> name?
>
Xavier Hanin a écrit :
>
> So I suggest to remove this interface impl from the two behavior
> implementation, rename IPushBehavior in IPushListener, and rename
> #addPushBehavior(Component component, String channel, IPushBehavior
> behavior) in #addPushListener(Component component, String channel,
> IPushListener listener)
>
> WDYT?
Right, so what do you think of addChannelEventListener and
IChannelEventListener ?
Indeed, it makes more sense like that. To be consistent, should we change
all Push* in Channel*?
Xavier
--
Vincent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
