Thats why peeps should add a user story if the site are non 
browsable(thats the part were you mention a video:).. But yeah I guess 
you're right:)

Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> That is because there is little point in putting intranet applications
> (or non-public facing applications) on the wiki: nobody can see the
> applications or browse them.
>
> /me reminds himself to create a video of some sorts for the application built.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 5/23/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> I must dissagree(on the part where you say that wicket are mostly used
>> in intranet apps), although not a wicket veteran yet(only been doing
>> wicket for around 1.5 years).
>>
>> The two projects I've been involved in during this periode has both been
>> using wicket. Both projects being commercially and also public
>> accessible. Also skimming the wiki looking at sites almost none seems to
>> be intranet ones..
>>
>> regards Nino
>>
>> Johan Compagner wrote:
>>     
>>> wicket is a very good fit for intranet development.
>>> I think it is mostly used in that kind of webapps.
>>>
>>> johan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/22/07, *Florian Hehlen* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL 
>>> PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi,
>>>
>>>     the reason we are comparing to Struts is that that's one of the
>>>     contender. We are not a web-app shop. We need a general purpose
>>>     toolkit for intranet development. But since struts is so popular
>>>     it's being pitted against wicket.
>>>
>>>     Florian
>>>
>>>
>>>     Erik van Oosten wrote:
>>>       
>>>>     Hi Florian,
>>>>
>>>>     1- I am surprised you want to compare against Struts. Almost any 
>>>> modern web
>>>>     framework will kick ass compared to Struts.
>>>>
>>>>     2- I know only of one. It is the first article on this page on the 
>>>> wiki:
>>>>
>>>>     http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/articles-about-wicket.html. It has a 
>>>> very
>>>>
>>>>     nice comparison of Wicket and JSF listings. Its a simple application, 
>>>> you
>>>>     can easily image how to do it in Struts.
>>>>
>>>>     3- Wicket is weak at sites that need to handle millions of hits per 
>>>> minute
>>>>     (not many frameworks are good at this). Wicket is also not very good 
>>>> if you
>>>>
>>>>     need absolute and complete control on the format of your URLs. These 
>>>> are
>>>>     both extremes. I think Wicket will do very well for at least 90% of 
>>>> the web
>>>>     applications.
>>>>
>>>>     Good luck,
>>>>         Erik.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Florian Hehlen-2 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>>     Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>>     I am looking for help presenting wicket to my development team.
>>>>>
>>>>>     1-Has anyone out there had to defend wicket vs. struts and would you
>>>>>     have any resources/links/presentations to pass this way to help in
>>>>>
>>>>>     presenting wicket to our group?
>>>>>
>>>>>     2-Has anyone made any measurements/analysis of the code-base needed 
>>>>> for
>>>>>     identical application in wicket vs. struts(or any other framework)
>>>>>
>>>>>     3-Objectively, I am also looking for what wicket is weak at.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     florian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>     
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>>>     Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>>>     control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>>>     http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Wicket-user mailing list
>>>     Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>     <mailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wicket-user mailing list
>>> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>>>
>>>       
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wicket-user mailing list
>> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>>
>>     
>
>
>   

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to