Of course not. I believe we did our best. But there were couple of
changes (such as short->int, etc) that needs recompiling. And again,
this was not intentional, it just happened.

-Matej

On 6/27/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I remember many quarrels about maintaining binary compatibility... Are
> you saying those were for nothing?
>
> /me crawls back in cave
>
> Martijn
>
> On 6/27/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe even i 1.2.6 isn't binary compatible (there might be some
> > very small minor changes that slipped in by accident), it's still
> > should be almost drop-in replacement, and the upgrade should be rather
> > painless.
> >
> > Wicket 1.2.2 is from august 2006, that's almost a year ago.
> >
> > -Matej
>
>
> --
> Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to